Islam's Prime Directive

THE PRIMARY goal of Islam, according to its doctrine, is to bring the law of Allah (known as Sharia) to all people on earth. That isn't much different than similar goals of other religions. The thing that makes Islam different is the methods their doctrine allows them to use.

Islam's doctrine is unique because its history is unique. The three other large, fairly recent religions (Buddhism, Christianity, and Taoism) arose within an already-existing legal system. The methods they could use to spread their religion were limited by that system. Christianity, for example, arose at a time when Judaism was strong, and Rome was even stronger. If Christians had been armed insurrectionists, if they had tried to take over the Roman government, if they had tried gaining converts by force, Christianity would have been annihilated before it really got started.

The same can be said for Buddhism and Taoism.

The same was also true for Islam when it first started in Mecca. Mohammad and his followers were a minority and had to practice tolerance of others (or be crushed). But when they moved to a new city (Medina), things changed. They soon
ruled that city. In Arabia at the time, no overriding legal or military power existed — the region now known as Saudi Arabia was made up of independent tribes and clans.

In other words, the religion of Islam arose where there was no external imposition of limits, and it developed a religious doctrine quite different from other religions we are familiar with. Islamic doctrines unapologetically advocate the use of force, warfare, deceit, fear, torture, and slaughter to bring the law of Allah to the world. This sounds really horrible, but I'm not making this up. You can verify this all yourself, and I wish you would. You should start by reading the Quran. It has been made relatively easy for you.

In their time, nothing existed to stop the fledgling religion from employing any means necessary. Unfortunately, it was all written down and has been considered holy doctrine ever since.

Since Mohammad existed in the seventh century, his biographical details were also written down and were never lost. What he did and said is well-preserved, as is the unaltered, unedited holy book of Islam, the Quran.

Unfortunately for non-Muslims, it says in the Quran no less than 91 times that a Muslim should follow Mohammad's example in all things and for all time.

So Islam's prime directive is to bring the law of Allah to all people on earth using any means necessary. You can say Islam's mission in three words: Islam must dominate. That's the bad news for us non-Muslims. The good news is that many people who consider themselves Muslims don't know much about Islam, and even some who know about this prime directive are not interested in pursuing it.

Some are pursuing it earnestly, however, and it is worth knowing about because some of the ways they're pursuing it are pretty clever. Learn more about that here: Perfectly Legal Jihad. Once you know what's going on and what devout, orthodox Muslims are aiming at, it is a lot easier to prevent them from gaining any ground.

7 comments:

  1. Thank you for your very information website
    Mary-Louise

    ReplyDelete
  2. The politically correct insist that Islam is a religion equal to all others and freedom of religion in America requires that we treat their religion as equal to all other religions. All the images we have seen in the news point to a different truth--a culture of backward people living the same as they did 2,000 years ago, cruelty to women, fanatical anti-Western hatred, and hatred of anything modern, hatred of an open society, and fanatical worship of the Koran. Allowing more Muslims into the country will bring trouble because Christians and Jews will never accept or allow the Islamification of this country. There are exceptions: those who helped us in the war George Bush unnecessarily started in Iraq and Afganistan and President Obama reluctantly continues. We have to find another way to deal with the Middle East besides using our military might. This struggle will continue and will get worse.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stopping, at least temporarily, Muslim immigration, would be a good first step. Please sign the petition:

    http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2009/01/stop-muslim-immigration-to-united.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. America and Europe must stop Muslims to settle in their mids if they really love freedom. If Muslim surpass non-Muslim population in America and Europ, we all will have to follow Saudi Arabian roles.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The rise of "Black Muslims" in our country in the 60's and 70's and into the present is and was a self-imposed direct alignment for hatred against the Western World. A hatred that could be deemed acceptable, as it was the simple converting to an existing religion with the necessary legal protections. Islam has the most important ingredient and that is hatred. Too bad our founding fathers, the powerful futurists that they were, didn't allow for freedom of religion with the exception of Islam.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm afraid that they would turn to the Iranian shiite rendition of islam.....the Twelvers.

    The Twelvers are by far the largest and most dangerous group of Shiite Muslims, because the Iranians are Twelvers. Perhaps eighty percent of the Shiis are Twelvers. Twelvers constitute ninety percent of the modern population of Iran and fifty-five to sixty percent of the population of Iraq. Twelver Shiites are the majority in Iran, Iraq, Azerbaijan and also have substantial populations in Turkey, Pakistan, Lebanon, Syria, India, Afghanistan and Bahrain.

    The other Islamists are Sunni (Saudi Arabia).

    ReplyDelete
  7. In all fairness, and not to contradict the thrust of this website- I have trouble differentiating between magic-based religions. If a God is said to exist the shakers and movers will continue trying to get us to mass murder in the name of God so that they can better steal land, oil, or whatever in the name of God. I'm not convinced that stopping the advance of the second largest magic-based religion on this world is a strong enough measure. It's only perhaps a good start. I'm actually in favor of social profiling as a means to keep undesirables out. Those of cultures and religions tending to overpopulate pose a threst greater than the prospect of war with them.

    ReplyDelete